Project Respect

Problem Solving GRIEVANCE Process

revised: october 1, 2004

 

Purpose

 

In an effort to bring some consistency into the process of dealing with grievances from foster parents at the local level, the following guidelines should be used to develop a plan to resolve concerns that are brought to the county’s attention by foster parents. 

 

The process utilizes various individuals and groups that can help the county and the foster parents work through and resolve problems and conflicts.  All of these will consider applicable policy related to the problem. They will offer guidance to all parties through a process in which they discuss the issues, options and design their own agreement to resolve the dispute. The process

·        gives everyone an opportunity to be heard;

·        affords everyone an opportunity to develop new ways of dealing with problems;

·        affords opportunities to create working solutions, and

·        can help to eliminate the time and distress of unresolved conflict and possible placement disruption for children in care.

 

The intent of this process is not to remove authority from the local DHR offices to handle problems within the county or to punish counties for any complaint filed by foster parents.  This process gives foster parents and the local office an opportunity to be heard when problems arise and when all parties cannot come to an agreement or acceptable resolution to the problem.

 

General Guidelines

 

1.  If you have questions regarding this process, call 334-242-9500 and ask for the Office of Foster Care.

 

2.   The Project Respect State Grievance Committee as selected by the Commissioner of DHR will include 2 county person(s) (County Director or supervisory level), 2 foster parent advocate(s) (with two designated alternates), and 2 state DHR/Office of Foster Care staff.

 

3.   The entire process, from initial contact with the county office until a referral to the Project Respect State Grievance Committee, should take no longer than 30 days.  If the solution is ongoing and all parties are satisfied with actions being taken, referral to the State Grievance Committee should not be initiated.

 

4.   Timely response from the County DHR offices is crucial to the process.  Failure to respond to complaints timely may result in earlier referral of complaints to the State Grievance Committee.

 

5.      Persons appropriate to file complaints using this process include:

(a)   Any foster parent or related caregiver for a child in DHR custody.

(b)   DHR staff, including workers, supervisors or managers


Examples of possible problems/concerns are given in item # 7 of these General Guidelines.

 

 

 

6. The guidelines specified here are not in effect if a report is considered urgent by the foster parent(s) including their concern that the safety of a child is being endangered by actions that are being taken or failure by the agency to take action.  In these situations, the foster parent can make immediate contact with the individual(s) that he/she feels will provide timely response to the situation. This may include local or staff foster parent or staff liaisons, AFAPA regional representatives, SDHR personnel, etc.

 

7.  Appropriate  referrals would include, but are not limited to

a.      Problem with communication between line worker and the foster parent – lack of courtesy, partnership, respect, professionalism in communication such as failing to return phone calls, failure to listen to concerns, etc.

b.      Lack of responsiveness to requests by the foster parent for assistance in dealing with the children in care.

c.      Removal of children without due notice according to applicable policies and standards.

d.      Issues of potential safety risks to children.

e.      Failure to follow policies.

f.        Failure to arrange needed services for the child/foster family.

g.      Failure to schedule an ISP as requested.

h.      Situations where the local foster parent association or SDHR staff have identified trends in actions by the county that would be appropriate for grievance review, but individual foster parents have not filed a grievance.  (One example: SDHR Family Service consultant staff note repeated instances of lack of partnership between staff and foster parents.  They may ask Project Respect to review and make recommendations.)

i.        Closure of a foster family home by DHR. (This process will serve as the appeal rights referred to in the Foster Parent Bill of Rights Act for foster parents whose foster home is closed by DHR.  Therapeutic (or other) foster parents whose homes are closed by therapeutic foster care providers or other child placing agencies cannot use this process to appeal these closures).

j.         Failure to abide by the provisions of the Foster Parent Bill of Rights.

 

Note:  Having a pending CAN investigation does not preclude a foster parent from filing a grievance on issues unrelated to the CAN.

 

8.  Inappropriate mediation referrals would include, but are not limited to:

a.      When a court case is pending in regard to the situation.

b.      When a CA/N has been filed and the subject of the grievance is a part of the CA/N investigation.

c.      When a foster parent does not agree with the permanency plan developed by the local team.

d.      Recommendations related to personnel actions within the county office.

 

Note:  The items listed in the inappropriate mediation section do not preclude foster parents from making contact with the Office of Foster Care or a SDHR consultant to discuss their concerns.


 

9.   The foster parents must file a written complaint on the attached referral form. The foster parent should send an original to the local Department and maintain a copy for their personal files.  This form will also be the source of filing a complaint with the state committee if that becomes necessary.

 

10. By implementation of these guidelines, foster parents have the right to file complaints and discuss concerns with County Directors, the foster parent liaison, the DHR staff liaison, supervisors, case workers, local Project Respect or Foster Care Advisory Committees, AFAPA Regional Representatives or the Project Respect State Grievance Committee without being considered in violation of the rules of confidentiality.  Care should always be taken to mention only case situations, not case/children names.  Care should also be taken to avoid discussion with other individuals not listed above as this would be considered a violation of the rules of confidentiality.  (Note:  It is not a violation of confidentiality to provide the information requested in the grievance process to the Office of Foster Care.)

 

11. Foster parents should never feel alone in the process of filing a complaint and the Department should be sure that every source of support for the foster parent is arranged.  Caution should be taken to prevent this from becoming the agency vs. the foster parent.  Foster parents are partners in the planning for children and have every right to have their opinions and concerns heard and have the right to be considered as a valuable part of the ISP/treatment team. The foster parents should have support from the DHR staff liaison, the foster parent liaison or another foster parent selected by the local association, if requested, in filing the complaint.  The foster parents can also call AFAPA at 1-888-545-2372 to request assistance.

 

12. Actions taken by the Department when a complaint is filed shall never be retaliatory or punitive in nature.  No person who files a grievance, complaint, or concern will be punished, discriminated against, threatened, or retaliated against in any way for filing such action.  When evidence proves that a staff member has retaliated against a foster parent, that staff member is subject to disciplinary action, according to applicable personnel policies and procedures.

 

13. Larger County offices may have more supervisory levels to be considered in developing a chain of command for handling of problems/concerns/issues.  Each County office should use the information contained in this document as a guideline in developing a local process that will be effective and efficient in handling this matter.

 

14. The Project Respect Grievance Committee will work with therapeutic providers and private agency providers to assure that the process of addressing concerns is not hindered.

 

15. If the grievance is concerning an office within State DHR, the local DHR office or the foster parent should send the initial complaint, to the appropriate Division/Office at SDHR using the attached paperwork.  If, within 30 days, there has been no resolution to the problem, the paperwork can then be forwarded to the Office of Foster Care as per the guidelines in this memo.

 

16. An ISP meeting (which includes the foster parent with the grievance) may be required at any point in the problem solving process to reach a resolution to the complaint/concern.


 

17. This process can be used by providers of care to children in DHR custody whether the placement is in a regular or therapeutic foster home setting, related foster care or related care.  However, this process is only to be used to resolve disputes between DHR and foster parents.  It is not applicable to disputes between therapeutic foster parents and their therapeutic provider or child-placing agency and does not apply to the closing of a therapeutic or other foster home licensed/approved by an agency other than DHR.  This process is not intended for providers of residential care.

 

18. If the complaint or concern is in reference to another county (such as when a child is placed across county lines in a neighboring county and the complaint is against the neighboring county), the local foster parent should discuss the complaint or concern with their county DHR liaison and if appropriate, the local DHR staff liaison should assist the local foster parent in completing the problem solving process documentation.  The foster parent should also contact the child’s social worker about the complaint or concern to seek resolution to the problem and proceed with taking the steps as outlined in below.  In all of these situations, the local DHR office should be notified of the problems that the local foster parents are experiencing and should help the foster parent to seek resolution to the problem across county lines.  If the foster parent is a therapeutic foster parent, they should file their grievance with the county holding custody of the child.  These foster parents may choose liaisons from this same county, the county in which they live or ask their therapeutic agency to assist them in the grievance process. 

 

The Process

 

A.     Local Grievance Process

 

1.      When an appropriate party, as listed in the guidelines, initiates a complaint, both in writing and by direct contact, with the local DHR office (regardless with whom the initial contact is made), the local Department should respond (acknowledging receipt of the grievance) to the person(s) making the complaint within five (5) business days with a response to the problem. 

 

a.      There should be a clearly identified chain of command for filing grievance at the local level that specifies who will respond to complaints filed by the foster parent within five (5) business days.

b.      The chain of command should be the line worker, the supervisor, the DHR staff liaison, the program supervisor, child welfare administrator, the assistant director, and/or the county director respectively.  Also refer to (d) below.

c.      At any point during this process after the grievance has been elevated to a supervisory level, a consultant from the Office of Child Welfare Consultation can be contacted for assistance.

d.      When the foster parent receives any inappropriate response to a request for assistance, they should immediately move up the chain of command. When the foster parent does not receive a timely response to a request, they should immediately move up the chain of command. The next person in the chain of command should respond (acknowledging receipt of grievance) to the person(s) making the complaint by the next business day.

e.      The foster parent can request an ISP to address the issue or when appropriate may contact any service provider whose services have been arranged in the ISP for guidance in addressing the problem. 

f.        Written complaints should be directed to the county director who will copy and disseminate to each person in the chain of command for the local office

 

g.      The foster parent can also ask for assistance from the foster parent liaison for the county (either the foster parent’s county of residence, or the county holding custody of the child) in seeking resolution to the problem.  The liaison can make telephone calls to DHR staff on behalf of the foster parent.

 

2.      If within five (5) business days of receipt of grievance the local office determines that there is no satisfactory solution immediately available, the local office should advise the person making the complaint (a) of alternative suggestions for resolving the problem or (b) of a specific amount of time that is needed to come to a more satisfactory resolution.  If there is no response (acknowledging receipt of the grievance and outlining time lines for hearing/addressing grievance) from the county within the initial five-day time frame, the complaint can be immediately elevated to the State Grievance Committee.

 

3.      Weekly status reports should be provided in writing to the person making the complaint during the period of time that the local office is trying to find a resolution.

 

4.      The local office should involve pertinent individuals/staff in seeking a resolution from the case social worker up through the County Director and including the DHR and foster parent liaisons.

 

5.      When a resolution is reached at the local level, the foster parent should be contacted to determine complete satisfaction.  This contact should be made by the county director and/or his/her designee.

 

Note:  A report of all grievances reviewed locally should be provided to the County Director for review by their local Foster Care Advisory Council.

 

6.      After 30 days of working with the county on the grievance, the person making the complaint does not feel that there has been a timely response or a satisfactory resolution to the problem, the complaint can be elevated to the State Grievance Committee.

 

7.   The form attached, or any other document showing the required information, should be mailed to:

 

Project Respect State Grievance Committee

Office of Foster Care

Alabama Department of Human Resources

50 Ripley Street

Montgomery, Alabama  36130

 

 

B.  SDHR Grievance Committee Process:

 

1.       When the complaint is forwarded to SDHR, the complaint will be logged in by the Office of Foster Care.  (Complaint Log)   

 

2.      The Office of Foster Care will notify the foster parent and the local DHR office via a form letter that the complaint has been received. This form letter will also request copies of records and other necessary documentation be sent to the SDHR Office of Foster Care.


 

3.      The Project Respect Committee members will be notified at the same time of the receipt of complaint and a date set to review the case.

 

4.      Upon a preliminary review of the case by the staff in the Office of Foster Care, assistance from the Office of Child Welfare Consultation may be requested (if the consultant has not already been involved in reviewing the case/situation).  This should be done within five working days of receipt of the referral. 

 

If the consultant has already been involved in reviewing the information, a report will be forwarded to the Office of Foster Care within two days. Information that may be necessary for review of a complaint is the most current ISP,  any medical/psychological assessments or summaries, CAN files, foster parent records, payment records for providers, case records, QA reports, court orders/reports to name a few. 

 

5.      Depending on the nature of the complaint, other steps that may be taken by the Office of Foster Care may include:

 

a. Request  an emergency ISP be held to look at the issue in question with specification as to which parties should attend.

b. Recommend  emergency steps to ensure safety of child which might include suspension of visitation; change in visitation location; safety measures to ensure careful monitoring of the case, temporary suspension of placement until safety measures are in place, etc.

c. Request  local QA committee review of case record with any recommendations.

d. Request a review of the case by a consultant including interviews with parties to the case to gain additional information

e. Other evaluations or assessments as deemed necessary.

 

All information should be reviewed and fact finding completed by the consultant with the Office of Foster care within ten (10) working days of the receipt of the complaint into the state office.

 

Based on records/documentation received with the grievance as well as any additional information obtained through the above listed activities, the Project Respect Grievance Committee may decide

a.      to review the case and make recommendations to the County, through the Commissioner; or

b.      to refer the grievance to mediation as described later in these guidelines

 

6.       If the committee will do a full review of the grievance with recommendations, they will meet within 21 working days of receipt of the grievance (date stamped). The committee’s review will include the County Office personnel, the foster parent, and others as appropriate in a staffing of the case.  This can be by phone or in person at a specified location, to consider recommendations and to discuss a plan of action. 

 

7.       Documentation of this review process will be maintained.


 

8.       Within five working days after this meeting/conference call, a report from the committee will be made to The Commissioner.  The Committee’s recommendations may include:

a.      no further action is necessary

b.      actions that should be taken by county – recommendations will be made

c.      referral should be made to trained mediators (described below).

 

9.       The Commissioner will have final word on the disposition of the grievance.  The commissioner will review the recommendations of the Project Respect Grievance Committee and will then send the county director a letter outlining the recommendations/instructions for next steps, as he/she deems appropriate.

 

If action by the county is contained in this letter, the County Director shall prepare a written response to the recommendations which includes the county’s plan for implementation or justification for any other action to be taken.  This letter and plan shall be sent within two weeks of receipt of the Commissioner’s letter/recommendations.  Additionally, documentation of actual steps and actions taken to resolve the problem will be provided to the Office of Foster Care until final resolution is attained. 

 

If “no further action” is recommended, the Commissioner will send a letter to the person filing the grievance. 

 

It should be noted that the grievance committee or state office staff are not to make changes in case plan. Recommendations for review and possible changes in case plan should be taken to the ISP/treatment team for consideration and action.  Results of said review shall be included in the county’s response to Commissioner and Office of Foster Care.

 

The Commissioner will be responsible for any consequences to staff for failure to report in a timely manner and/or follow recommendations without justification.

 

10.   A representative from the grievance committee will follow-up with the foster parent after the report is received from the county office. The committee will decide who this representative will be when they review the case and make recommendations.

 

11. If the recommendations from the committee include referral to a trained mediator, said mediation will be requested by The Office of Foster Care.  A co-mediator model will be utilized. The mediators will be a representative from SDHR (staff from the SDHR PACT Office, SDHR Legal Office) as well as a representative from AFAPA. The mediators will have no prior involvement in the dispute unless waived by all parties to the dispute.  Once referred to a mediator, the matter will be scheduled for mediation by the mediator in consultation with the parties. The agreement reached as a result of the mediation will be binding and signed by all parties.  When the agreement contains provisions that affects the child/family case plan, the same should be taken to the ISP/treatment team for consideration and action.


Foster Parent Grievance Referral Form

(This form may be used to file a complaint with the social worker, the supervisor, the County Director or the Project Respect State Grievance Committee)

 

1.      Name of Person making the complaint: ____________________________________________

Address of Person making the complaint: __________________________________________

Phone Number of the Person making the complaint: _________________________________

E-mail address of the Person making the complaint: _________________________________

 

2.      Person making the complaint is:            Foster parent        County Supervisor

                                                             Social Worker       Foster Parent Liaison

 Other, please identify role _______________________

 

3.      County(ies) involved:  __________________________________________________________

 

4.      CHILDREN INVOLVED:

FULL NAME

BIRTHDATE

 

FULL NAME

BIRTH-DATE